From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 21:28:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2052516A41C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 21:28:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from th_nuttapon@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay17-f35.bay17.hotmail.com [64.4.43.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDA143D1D for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 21:28:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from th_nuttapon@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:28:32 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 61.90.63.56 by by17fd.bay17.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 21:28:32 GMT X-Originating-IP: [61.90.63.56] X-Originating-Email: [th_nuttapon@hotmail.com] X-Sender: th_nuttapon@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: From: "Nuttapon Tharachaikul" To: cswiger@mac.com Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:28:32 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jun 2005 21:28:32.0728 (UTC) FILETIME=[57299580:01C57771] Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Need your advise. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 21:28:33 -0000 To Charles Swiger, Thanksyou very much, for give me a clerity. Without this feature,BSD still beautiful. BestRegards, Nuttapon T. >From: Charles Swiger >To: Nuttapon Tharachaikul >CC: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org >Subject: Re: Need your advise. >Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:39:42 -0400 > >On Jun 22, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Nuttapon Tharachaikul wrote: >> Please advise me , I would like to know that : Does BSD5.4 >>support "High Availability Clustering" same like RedHatAS3.0 ? In term >>of the capability to handle share disk-storage to support redundancy of >>fail over single point of failure, that if one server fail then another >>one can be promote to handle application service by share disk-storage in >>a middle. > >Hmm. The answer is probably no, FreeBSD doesn't have anything which >handles NFS or Samba failover transparently. > >-- >-Chuck > >