Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:17:25 +0200
From:      "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
To:        Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: What replaces csup? 
Message-ID:  <201209171517.q8HFHP6W097587@fire.js.berklix.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message "Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:45:23 CDT." <D97788AE24B7FFB0C79AA6FB@localhost> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
Reference:
> From:		Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com> 
> Reply-to:	Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com> 
> Date:		Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:45:23 -0500 
> Message-id:	<D97788AE24B7FFB0C79AA6FB@localhost> 

Paul Schmehl wrote:
> Now that we're switching to svn, is there a utility analogous to csup for 
> fetching source?  Is that utility available for 8.3?  

> (I'm assuming 
> subversion will become part of base in 9.x.)

No. Reporting what I read today in arch@freebsd.org :
Subject: Re: Fallout from the CVS discussion ...
Summary: some say subversion is changing too fast, they'll leave in ports.

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com
 Reply below not above, like a play script.  Indent old text with "> ".
 Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201209171517.q8HFHP6W097587>