From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 06:53:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F8D16A4CE; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:53:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2505643D5A; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:53:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C275482B; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:53:09 -0600 (CST) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 797C76D455; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:53:09 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:53:09 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek Message-ID: <20040325145309.GC61830@madman.celabo.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Pawel Jakub Dawidek , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org References: <20040324235120.GU8930@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20040325144553.GA61830@madman.celabo.org> <20040325145030.GB8930@darkness.comp.waw.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040325145030.GB8930@darkness.comp.waw.pl> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SUIDDIR -> security.bsd.suiddir_enable. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:53:10 -0000 On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 03:50:30PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 08:45:53AM -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > +> On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 12:51:20AM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > +> > Any objection on such exchange? > +> > +> I prefer it to remain a non-default compile-time option to discourage > +> use. > > Ok. BTW. Should we disallow usage of MNT_SUIDDIR flag for usermounts? > We don't do it now, I think. I think we should, but then again I don't use SUIDDIR so I'm not sure if this is desirable behavior or not. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org