From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 23:26:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D03084C6; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (unknown [IPv6:2602:d1:b4d6:e600:4261:86ff:fef6:aa2a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95A3CA88; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1ANRMpm065140; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:27:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: Baptiste Daroussin In-Reply-To: <20150210232005.GW29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150210223854.GT29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <006eaa48dacb4a495a498088d7554af3@ultimatedns.net>, <20150210232005.GW29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: [RFC] Removin the old make Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:27:22 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <612bc34dbea4014f25aab1290a6ad189@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:26:50 -0000 On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:20:05 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 03:13:29PM -0800, Chris H wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:38:54 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin > > wrote > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure for > > > that I want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove > > > the old make from base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th. > > Please note; I am not expressing any objection to it's removal. > > But would a 30-day window not be a more friendly. So as to better > > accommodate those whom will need to make the/a transition? > > > What transition, since 10.0 noone have fmake by default anymore? if one want > to keep using fmake he has to explicitly state it when building. Ahh. Sure. In all honesty, it was probably more of a "knee jerk" reaction on my part, when I noticed it was only a week away. :) > > Not that I'm against a 30-day windows but that does not seems worth it. > > Best regards, > Bapt --Chris --