From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 17:00:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5811116A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:00:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D1F43D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:00:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA7H0Z2G007414 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:00:35 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jA7H0ZUp007413; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:00:35 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:00:35 GMT Message-Id: <200511071700.jA7H0ZUp007413@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org From: Dejan Lesjak Cc: Subject: Re: ports/88584: XFree86-4 (4.5.0) port is not working. X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dejan Lesjak List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:00:36 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/88584; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dejan Lesjak To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, llevier@argosnet.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/88584: XFree86-4 (4.5.0) port is not working. Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:59:30 +0100 The message is trying to say that you are trying to install X11 implementation that is not default for your FreeBSD version. As of FreeBSD 5.3, the default is Xorg distribution, available from x11/xorg port. You can see more about this, as well as how to change this default, should you want to, in FAQ: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/x.html But yes, the message should be more descriptive.