From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 21:41:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551B01065673; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 21:41:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150F28FC1E; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 21:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o92LaP6g075270; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:36:25 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:36:45 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20101002.153645.1021672927781301295.imp@bsdimp.com> To: pluknet@gmail.com From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: References: <201009281533.o8SFXULh078409@svn.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, antoine@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r213248 - head/sys/kern X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 21:41:28 -0000 In message: Sergey Kandaurov writes: : On 2 October 2010 22:12, Antoine Brodin wrote: : > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Warner Losh wrot= e: : >> Author: imp : >> Date: Tue Sep 28 15:33:30 2010 : >> New Revision: 213248 : >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/213248 : >> : >> Log: : >> =A0This file has been unused for ages. =A0Retire it. : >> : >> =A0Submitted by: pluknet : >> : >> Deleted: : >> =A0head/sys/kern/Makefile : > : > Hi, : > : > What is the correct way to "make sysent" now ? : > : = : Hi. : = : It seems I just dumbbroke the useful functionality. I'm sorry. : Obviously that was somehow overlooked last time I checked it. : So, removing sysent target is not something intentional. : = : I think it should be simply reverted for now, or more preferably : restored with sysent target only. Please review the commit I just made to make sure that I didn't botch anything. I'm pretty sure I got it right, but you never know. Warner