Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 15:00:41 -0800 From: Jeffrey Barber <jab@rock.anchorage.net> To: "'freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org'" <freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org>, "'hackers@FreeBSD.ORG'" <hackers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Slow Etherlink Message-ID: <01BBA3DF.D5124740@jabpc.rtfm.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
OK, If we can get past all the sarcasim bull shit! I realize that the ping I showed for Linux seems to be slower than FreeBSD but the point is that I have faster telnet response from Linux than I do FreeBSD. For the more serious ppl who want to help. Let me rephrase my question: Why would pinging and telneting to FreeBSD be slower than that of a Linux box?
FreeBSD:
bash$ ifconfig -a
lp0: flags=8810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ep0: flags=863<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,SIMPLEX> mtu 1500
inet 19.51.13.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 19.51.13.255
lo0: flags=8009<UP,LOOPBACK,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
sl0: flags=c010<POINTOPOINT,LINK2,MULTICAST> mtu 552
tun0: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.356 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.342 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.362 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=0.349 ms
Linux:
PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.1 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.9 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.9 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1.0 ms
I have never seen the SIMPLEX entries before on other OS's. Can this be the problem or no? I have a 3com Etherlink III isa card installed the FreeBSD system of which I had in a Linux box previously.
Comments on trouble shooting this would be nice.
Thanks
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01BBA3DF.D5124740>