From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 08:14:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF0316A4DD; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:14:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D6143D41; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:14:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i22GE7Da037928 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK CN=khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu issuer=SSL+20Client+20CA); Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:14:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i22GE5mR037925; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:14:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:14:05 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200403021614.i22GE5mR037925@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Bruce M Simpson In-Reply-To: <20040302092825.GD884@saboteur.dek.spc.org> References: <4043B6BA.B847F081@freebsd.org> <200403011507.52238.wes@softweyr.com> <20040302031625.GA4061@scylla.towardex.com> <20040302042957.GH3841@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <20040302082625.GE22985@cell.sick.ru> <20040302084321.GA21729@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040302085556.GA23734@cell.sick.ru> <20040302092825.GD884@saboteur.dek.spc.org> X-Spam-Score: -9.9 () IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 04:46:37 -0800 cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: My planned work on networking stack X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:14:09 -0000 < said: > routed we support largely out of nostalgia, I guess. Modern routed does more than just RIP; it's responsible for all sorts of routing-table management tasks that we mostly just pretend don't exist (e.g., responding to RTM_LOSING messages). -GAWollman