From owner-freebsd-doc Wed Nov 6 13:27:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68D637B401 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 13:27:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E96F43E4A for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 13:27:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tmoestl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 29156 invoked by uid 0); 6 Nov 2002 21:27:22 -0000 Received: from p5086f4f7.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO forge.local) (80.134.244.247) by mail.gmx.net (mp007-rz3) with SMTP; 6 Nov 2002 21:27:22 -0000 Received: from tmm by forge.local with local (Exim 4.10 #1) id 189Xhs-0001CK-00; Wed, 06 Nov 2002 22:27:24 +0100 Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 22:27:24 +0100 From: Thomas Moestl To: "Bruce A. Mah" Cc: doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Please review: small patches for building documentation on FreeBSD/sparc64 Message-ID: <20021106212724.GB334@crow.dom2ip.de> References: <20021106150326.GA334@crow.dom2ip.de> <200211061842.gA6IgfcA037657@intruder.bmah.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200211061842.gA6IgfcA037657@intruder.bmah.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 2002/11/06 at 10:42:41 -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Thomas Moestl wrote: > > The main change is that I decided to go with openjade on sparc64, > > mainly because alpha is using it (I also had some problems with it, > > but that may have been due to a linker bug which I have since > > fixed). Is there any reason to prefer jade over openjade? > > My memory might be a little faulty, but I seem to remember that jade > either didn't compile or didn't run on the alpha. openjade works fine > on all platforms, except that it might have had difficulty dealing with > 8-bit characters. There was some discussion of this a little over a year > ago...look for a thread on hackers@ in August 2001 with the subject > "building 'release' and compiling doc ports". Hmmm, I think that openjade is best then. It's output in multibyte systems like Big5 or EUC-JP seems to not be mangled (as far as I can tell from visual inspection :), so I assume that the problems have been fixed now. > > The remaining diffs correct a missing perl build dependency, > > I recommend USE_PERL5 instead of adding to BUILD_DEPENDS. Oops, sorry, looks like edwin@ already added USE_PERL5 2 days ago while I wasn't paying attention. I used BUILD_DEPENDS in my patch because USE_PERL5 sets RUN_DEPENDS too, which is not necessary. > > and the bletcherous perl wrapper > > which breaks port dependencies (fatal in a release build setting). > > I presume you meant for the openjade port. If you use USE_PERL5 instead > of setting BUILD_DEPENDS, I think the ports infrastructure should do the > right thing. Unfortunately it does not. USE_PERL5 just consists of: BUILD_DEPENDS+= perl${PERL_VERSION}:${PORTSDIR}/lang/perl5 RUN_DEPENDS+= perl${PERL_VERSION}:${PORTSDIR}/lang/perl5 PERL_VERSION is 5.6.1 in current, and the perl wrapper does install a perl5.6.1 link. Thanks for reviewing! - Thomas -- Thomas Moestl http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0015675/ http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tmm/ PGP fingerprint: 1C97 A604 2BD0 E492 51D0 9C0F 1FE6 4F1D 419C 776C To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message