From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 12 21:22:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E082F16A469 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:22:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1717D13C45D; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:22:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47892F9C.3040109@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:22:36 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darren Pilgrim References: <47871856.2070505@bitfreak.org> <47874B18.5020408@FreeBSD.org> <47882812.1010403@bitfreak.org> <4788AC47.5060404@FreeBSD.org> <47891EBA.1030108@bitfreak.org> In-Reply-To: <47891EBA.1030108@bitfreak.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to unmount idle filesystem on 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:22:39 -0000 Darren Pilgrim wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Darren Pilgrim wrote: >>> softdep_waitidle: Failed to flush worklist for 0xc66e5298 >>> >>> A quick check and that message gets spit out whenever I issue >>> any of the following commands: >>> >>> # mount -uo ro /usr/ports # umount /usr/ports # umount -f /usr/ports >> >> As luck would have it I ran into this in my own testing >> yesterday, and Kostik Belousov has a proposed fix (apply it with >> patch -p2). This is against 8.0 but should also appy to 7.0. >> Don't know about 6.x. > > It didn't apply cleanly, with hunks failing in: > > sys/kern/vfs_subr.c (all) > sys/sys/vnode.h > sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c (hunk 4) > sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c > > The chunks that succeeded all had offsets, so I'm guessing the patch > isn't going to work for 6.x. OK, probably not. I guess once this is committed to 8 then we can ask him about MFC plans. Kris