Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:42:57 -0500 From: Shelby Cain <scain@exgenesis.com> To: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Edward Capriolo <edlinuxguru@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Invoking ldconfig without arguments wipes all hints and makes me very sad Message-ID: <1207924977.29840.7.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200804110035.04406.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> References: <1207855812.11735.39.camel@localhost> <200804102309.37024.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <1207863879.11735.85.camel@localhost> <200804110035.04406.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-SZDBqvYl80eeSFJ9fTQz Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 00:35 +0200, Mel wrote: >=20 > It translates to "be verbose about restoring factory settings", because=20 > without arguments it will restore the built-in set. Why does "factory settings" not include scanning the built-in system library path /usr/lib? From the man page, it would seem that if I truly wanted to remove all runtime information I'd want to run something along the lines of ldconfig -s. Am I misreading something? Also, under what circumstances does -v actually do something? I can't seem to find a case where -v actually alters the output of ldconfig. Regards, Shelby Cain --=-SZDBqvYl80eeSFJ9fTQz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBH/3jxFioAnfS4MHQRAgkXAJ48nbM/FicF/C18HlXmVX3Fr4CtWgCdHyxN PZC8oAYY0H+cRt1HPY8KpKc= =TIMh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SZDBqvYl80eeSFJ9fTQz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1207924977.29840.7.camel>