From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Nov 26 18:41:17 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C5D1BE7A4 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=RgF7Th=ZS=ssbglimited.co.uk=unix@eigbox.net) Received: from bosmailout06.eigbox.net (bosmailout06.eigbox.net [66.96.190.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47Mt5l5mbZz481l for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:41:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=RgF7Th=ZS=ssbglimited.co.uk=unix@eigbox.net) Received: from bosmailscan04.eigbox.net ([10.20.15.4]) by bosmailout06.eigbox.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1iZfls-0001kE-Lt for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:41:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ssbglimited.co.uk; s=dkim; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Reply-To: Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=jPMZcgGLk8n4bI7HrNbbcoD849/EP5yazjS9102XXxs=; b=NBqxnIVMlGgicoRa7UvUCd1KFs 33HIefBQgXxpbKMBGj1Xp5XWl1XFX7BOyXy/fEi+f1WgLP7WO29rsTqRMpSlpKtCU0Mfgy75CNPwy X6hdkRGfSY2pzIkEQwW0XfeNcvkRgXvsT5hg/Or1XJLOt83a0OZI2lSr5dOoItN4WXhsrdFr1utef 0ibILQ7W0cHNm5855XgA6xkhAFV5oca0bDGGNzJIH+Er+mYptOWdvGOOhwd+MKIbD7vqNCYBt//JX J/UC+RFTfh8PGKYfrTAzN1dn6kqvMolf1ALnttxHKm6eft574DX08TD5Tkwevtcjz7OBLhUSK6AYm jDefz62w==; Received: from [10.115.3.31] (helo=bosimpout11) by bosmailscan04.eigbox.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1iZfls-000141-IY for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:41:08 -0500 Received: from bosauthsmtp18.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.20.18.18]) by bosimpout11 with id Wih42102u0PPbB601ih7tb; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:41:08 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=RKvDJ8q+ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=hsonH7E3nOZjOFuRJksPKA==:117 a=JpjoeYlqMQu1FOXtmSia+Q==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=MeAgGD-zjQ4A:10 a=nkE5dCGgubMA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=NC17Gbr2LkiayBkNNAcA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 Received: from cpc96382-rdng26-2-0-cust607.15-3.cable.virginm.net ([86.30.86.96]:13979 helo=[192.168.0.100]) by bosauthsmtp18.eigbox.net with esmtpa (Exim) id 1iZflo-0002qs-Qr for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:41:04 -0500 Subject: Re: SRv6 in FreeBSD To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <201911261133.xAQBXehk002681@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> From: Unix Codenetworks Message-ID: <3c7ffebc-3ca9-eceb-36e7-2c7a0975d746@ssbglimited.co.uk> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:41:00 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201911261133.xAQBXehk002681@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-EN-UserInfo: d94ecc27d8c618b705af6c7847bf2b9d:931c98230c6409dcc37fa7e93b490c27 X-EN-AuthUser: unix@ssbglimited.co.uk Sender: Unix Codenetworks X-EN-OrigIP: 86.30.86.96 X-EN-OrigHost: cpc96382-rdng26-2-0-cust607.15-3.cable.virginm.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47Mt5l5mbZz481l X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ssbglimited.co.uk header.s=dkim header.b=NBqxnIVM; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of SRS0=RgF7Th=ZS=ssbglimited.co.uk=unix@eigbox.net designates 66.96.190.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=SRS0=RgF7Th=ZS=ssbglimited.co.uk=unix@eigbox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.73 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ssbglimited.co.uk:s=dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.96.128.0/18]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ssbglimited.co.uk]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.90)[0.899,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(2.10)[ip: (5.10), ipnet: 66.96.128.0/18(2.93), asn: 29873(2.51), country: US(-0.05)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ssbglimited.co.uk:+]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.94)[0.937,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[6.190.96.66.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[unix@ssbglimited.co.uk,SRS0=RgF7Th=ZS=ssbglimited.co.uk=unix@eigbox.net]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[96.86.30.86.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29873, ipnet:66.96.128.0/18, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[unix@ssbglimited.co.uk,SRS0=RgF7Th=ZS=ssbglimited.co.uk=unix@eigbox.net]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:41:17 -0000 Hi Rodney, I haven't said that is not approved or an RFC exist (there are many and some interesting use cases) , but can you tell me of any in production deployments? The conservatory still there, if you check with your customer, how many are willing to deploy it? Open for an offline talk about it as i really like to know if you are seeing other thing.. Best regards. Santiago On 2019-11-26 11:33, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >> Hi Alex, >> >> While I'm not a BSD developer, i really doubt it, considering that the >> building blocks for SR are not there ( mpls support or just label >> push/pop/swap). > He specifically stated SRv6 which is not MPLS based. > The building blocsk if one was to need this in a BSD are in > OpenBSD which has an MPLS implementation. > >> On the other hand, on SRv6 as you mentioned you rely on IPv6 headers and >> there is a lot of conservatory about it.... ( unless you are a Cisco fan!) > :-) The SRH is 5 years and 26 revisions into the process and has > been "Submitted to IESG for Publication" per: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header/ > so it should be possible for someone to do an implementation in FreeBSD > >> I'm interesting on the use case, if you don't mind... is it just service >> chaining you application ? Usually servers are just part of an overlay ( >> call it VXLAN,? MPLS? or something over something else...) > I would be interested to here the use cases as well. > >> Best regards. >> >> Santiago >> >> >> On 2019-11-25 03:43, madhava gaikwad via freebsd-net wrote: >>> Hello Experts, >>> I want to know if there is any effort/planning going on to implement Segment Routing (RFC 8402?https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8402). I see Linux supporting it. Wondering if there is something planned on FreeBSD too.My app runs on FreeBSD and I have a use case to share information from one application gateway to another about connection identity. I thought SRv6 header can help me here. >>> Thank you.Alex. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >>