From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 29 15:41:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66DF37B401 for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 15:41:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B42443F75 for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 15:41:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h2TNfaA7016337; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 16:41:36 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 16:40:42 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20030329.164042.94336976.imp@bsdimp.com> To: ler@lerctr.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <269400000.1048711273@lerlaptop.iadfw.net> References: <269400000.1048711273@lerlaptop.iadfw.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Confusing message(4.8-RC) X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 23:41:43 -0000 In message: <269400000.1048711273@lerlaptop.iadfw.net> Larry Rosenman writes: : Is there a reason why the uplcom driver puts out the following when the : /dev node is ucom? Because device name != driver name. It should actually report that ucom attached at uplcom, in a NEWBUSly correct world, but doesn't right now. I think due ot sharing a lot of code with NetBSD. Warner