Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Mar 1999 17:51:08 -0600
From:      Chris Csanady <cc@137.org>
To:        Darryl Okahata <darrylo@sr.hp.com>
Cc:        freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG, ken@plutotech.com
Subject:   Re: SCSI disk oddities and Buslogic problems.. 
Message-ID:  <19990312235108.302BFAB@friley-185-205.res.iastate.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 12 Mar 1999 15:12:25 PST." <199903122312.PAA12555@mina.sr.hp.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Well, therein lies the problem.  When I disable disconnection on these drives,
the performance is just as advertised.  So, does it mean that the problem
is likely driver related?

Chris

>sthaug@nethelp.no wrote:
>
>> Chris Csanady <cc@137.org> wrote:
>> > In this case, I have found that while running the following commands that
>> > the data transfer is very erratic.
>> > 
>> > 	dd if=/dev/rda2s3 of=/dev/null bs=128k (or any place on the disk..)
>> > 
>> > 	iostat -w 1 da2
>> 
>> No problem with a 9 GB model here. Typical iostat output:
>
>     I have seen strange things with 3.1-RELEASE (I've yet to try
>-current), and tagged queueing.  Using 3.1-RELEASE, an Adaptec 7895
>controller (built into my Gigabyte 6BXDS motherboard) and two IBM
>Ultrastar 9ES drives striped together using vinum, I get strange
>performance numbers using iozone (yeah, iozone isn't very good for
>benchmarking striped drives, but I'm just using it as a zero-th order
>gauge).
>
>     Individually (if I do not use vinum and just newfs a single drive), 
>I get around 11MB/s write, and 13MB/s read.  No problem here.
>
>     If I stripe the drives together using vinum, and use the default
>newfs values, I get something like 3.7MB/s write, and 16MB/s read.  The
>write throughput sucks.  If I run newfs with 4K frag sizes, the write
>throughput jumps up to around 7MB/sec.  Better, but still not great.
>
>     However, if I go into the BIOS and disable SCSI disconnect, the
>write throughput jumps back up to 11MB/s.  Much better, but disabling
>disconnects kinda defeats the purpose of striping ....
>
>     The only thing I can think of is that tags are somehow involved, as 
>disabling disconnects also disables tags.
>
>     However, one slightly unusual thing about the striped drives is
>that one drive is a plain fast/wide disk ("IBM DDRS-39130W S97B"), and
>the other is the LVD version running in single-ended mode ("IBM
>DDRS-39130D DC1B"), but this shouldn't matter.
>
>--
>	Darryl Okahata
>	darrylo@sr.hp.com
>
>DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
>constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Hewlett-Packard, or of the
>little green men that have been following him all day.
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
>





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990312235108.302BFAB>