From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 10 02:50:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE3416A41C for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 02:50:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1146043D53 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 02:50:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y7so72615rne for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 19:50:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SjJnORUkaTMERVkC0lxaCm4/sDrHZuWwHYKKgp4qACxvWA1tdic7UraiFjqkwPlXDSwypc/2VfXwwo51KJ6EbieHtqssUkps2Pha3ZDnFI7FTffkDnoQ9nWqaGbODwJMR4XYMqX8oikfTE6zGZ9WJUFJdgbqcVDbSfOvojOPGdM= Received: by 10.38.14.73 with SMTP id 73mr612657rnn; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 19:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.209.73 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <84dead720506091950779d1661@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:20:29 +0530 From: Joseph Koshy To: Garance A Drosehn In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050609234619.AD1F67306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joseph Koshy List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 02:50:30 -0000 > Hmm. Is this due to my kproc_info change? If so, why did it > break here and not when I built it on my own machines? No, its my code. I suspect that the tinderboxes use a different (stricter) set of compiler flags than the 'make buildworld' / 'make universe' ones. Specifically, the regular build uses -fno-strict-aliasing. Will fix. --=20 FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy