From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 09:30:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA76E16A403 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:30:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E372343D53 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:30:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so133215nzf for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:30:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=TPQL+eG3hXfh9QRrDm1i9AglEgXEQU7uCCmiB8J4NHVOoTtCyjYSrFgWyAGNjsqDB5TaPJqYcswmoSrV4uVFfRFZCobTdHfCmWJJiccy8iA2Sgj7BVGWmdwL2tUhCMZSPTs6k/nw9m1JbcF8gmocPOheJ+mNeQZkY4uHNNfz6jc= Received: by 10.65.137.2 with SMTP id p2mr308236qbn; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:30:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.203.20 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:30:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:30:17 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: vd@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060511052958.GA69280@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200605101908.k4AJ89iI073410@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060511052958.GA69280@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0e5f1dcdf5c5bff3 Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, osa@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/ftp/gwget Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/ftp/gwget/files patch-src__gwget_data.c patch-src_gwget_data.c patch-src_main.c patch-src_wget-log.c X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:30:20 -0000 On 5/11/06, Vasil Dimov wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:08:09PM +0000, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > sat 2006-05-10 19:08:09 UTC > [...] > > 1.1 +10 -0 ports/ftp/gwget/files/patch-src__gwget_data.c (n= ew) > > 1.2 +0 -10 ports/ftp/gwget/files/patch-src_gwget_data.c (de= ad) > > About the patches filenaming under files/ we are trying to follow some > convention - see ports/Tools/scripts/splitpatch.pl, it's best to always > use that for generating the file names for new patches. Thanks, I'll take a good look. > The reason for not renaming all ports/*/*/files/* to conform to a single > convention is that the history would be lost. > > You should avoid renaming files this way (whatever the new and the > old names are) because the history is lost. I understand this very clearly, the file had no history though, it's just one missing header which should probable be pushed upstream. Thanks!