Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 18:40:11 GMT From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/148777: [New Port] sysutils/qjail: Utility to deploy large number of jails quickly Message-ID: <201105221840.p4MIeBYQ014148@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/148777; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, joeb@a1poweruser.com
Cc:
Subject: ports/148777: [New Port] sysutils/qjail: Utility to deploy large
number of jails quickly
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 19:38:07 +0100
Hi Joe,
I understand your frustration at the port taking a while to be
committed, but you simply can't expect things to be committed when
advice is ignored.
Why are you still using ${CP} when you should be using
${INSTALL_DATA}, and ${CP} -r when you should be using
${COPYTREE_SHARE}?
Why is the DISTFILES line commented rather than removed?
Why aren't you handling configuration files properly [1]?
Why have you included the WRKDIR in the shar?
Why have you _still_ not run portlint?
Also, your mailer is messing up the shar. You're better off putting it
up on a site somewhere, I'll be happy to host a correct shar for you
if you email it to me as a tar.
You will not get this committed until you've actually done it
properly, it's as simple as that.
Chris
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/book.html#PLIST-CONFIG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201105221840.p4MIeBYQ014148>