Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Apr 2008 02:18:33 +0800
From:      darcsis@gmail.com (Denise H. G.)
To:        Peter Wullinger <peter.wullinger@gmail.com>
Cc:        amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cpufreq troubles AMD 64 X2 (running i386)
Message-ID:  <86prsws1ae.fsf@pluton.xbsd.name>
In-Reply-To: <20080410063339.GA13719@kaliope.home> (Peter Wullinger's message of "Thu\, 10 Apr 2008 08\:33\:39 %2B0200")
References:  <20080410063339.GA13719@kaliope.home>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wullinger <peter.wullinger@gmail.com> writes:

> [to -amd64, unsure if it should better go to -stable]
>
> Hello Folks,
>
> Since the archives turn up nothing but dead threads, I'd like to
> raise the issue once again: It seems to me, that on certain 
> configurations (like mine), cpuqfreq does not work together with 
> AMD 64 X2 CPUs. Note that this is running in 32-bit mode, for
> the lack of 64-bit nVidia drivers.
>
> The machine has never been able to use powernow since upgrading
> last year and cpufreq has consistently failed with
>
> device_attach: powernow0 attach returned 6
>
> (pruned verbose dmesg attached)
>
> Any ideas or suggestions how I can help to track down the problem?

how about `HWPMC(4)' ?

I'm running 7-STABLE/amd64, and I have `options HWPMC_HOOKS' in my
kernel configuration, with `hwpmc(4)' compiled as a kld. everything
works fine. But I'm not sure if it will work on i386.

>
> Cheers,
> 	Peter

-- 
Denise H. G. <darcsis AT gmail DOT com>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86prsws1ae.fsf>