From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Oct 20 11:43:43 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA12151
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 11:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA12139
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 11:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA13795; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 11:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch),
        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD hackers)
Subject: Re: Urge to apply the vn device hack even to 2.2.5 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 20 Oct 1997 10:15:44 MDT."
             <199710201615.KAA29216@rocky.mt.sri.com> 
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 11:41:33 -0700
Message-ID: <13791.877372893@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> My advice is to 'just do it'.  I suspect Jordan must have the patch on
> his build box in order for him to roll the release, and since there are
> few hours left to do it in, it should be done ASAP.

I don't, that's the weird thing.  I'm running a standard 2.2-stable
kernel here.  Maybe it only hits in situations where you have a
certain amount of RAM?

In any case, the tag is going down in just over 6 hours, so a decision
will need to be made quickly. :)

					Jordan