Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 23:54:23 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> Cc: "\[LoN\]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de>, Jahnke <jahnke@sonatabio.com>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Frank Subject: Re: Acrobat - linuxpluginwrapper broken again? Message-ID: <20060807235423.4c2c41bb.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <m37j1l3qwx.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> References: <1154902825.2513.8.camel@localhost> <44D66EC6.6020103@gmx.de> <m37j1l3qwx.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 10:12:46 +0200 Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> wrote: > (Note I haven't installed a Linuxulator on my FreeBSD machines, so > forgive me if my questions are just shooting into the blue.) No problem. LPW haven't required a Linuxulator. > This looks like some GNU libc 2.3 stuff, which changed at that time -- > I'm not sure about the details, but between GNU libc 2.2 and 2.3, the > ctype.h stuff was changed, and the GNU libc versions I've been toying > with can be hacked to not refer to __ctype_b_loc@@GLIBC_2.3.4 by > defining __NO_CTYPE before all #includes. This is a big problem for compatible, I think. But I cannot fix without 7-current with SYMVER_ENABLE. Yes, I can fix on 7-current with SYMVER_ENABLE. I'm just rewriting LPW as Userland COMPAT_LINUX Technology[TM]:-). In this time, prototype level, you can try-it by getting from following URL. http://people.freebsd.org/~nork/uclt-20060805.tar.bz2 > I'm not sure if that would need to happen for Adobe's Reader or the > linuxpluginwrapper. > Can you check which version of the Linux glibc or libc your system has > installed? Can you double check that the pluginwrapper picks the right > libc if there are alternatives? pluginwrapper has some glibc functions, so no related version of glibc.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060807235423.4c2c41bb.nork>