Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:01:04 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 204494] [PATCH] sysutils/mdf2iso: mark UN'BROKEN (fetchable)
Message-ID:  <bug-204494-13-HmhkqmXWF8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-204494-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-204494-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204494

--- Comment #5 from Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #4)
> @Matthew / @Chris, thank you both for submitting changes to rescue this
> port. Can you organise/decide among yourselves which patch should be
> committed.
> 
> Since this port has no maintainer, both changes 'technically' have implicit
> approval, so I'm going to reset the flag until you've both decided and
> provide instructions.
> 
> 1) Whichever way we go, we should have redundant MASTER_SITES and a
> 'non-fork' situation. Where did version 3.1 come from?
> 
> 2) Regarding the merge (MFH) to quarterly, a separate changeset should be
> attached just for the fix (if it applied to the latest quarterly), as
> version updates don't go there (which I'm still unsure about)

@Kubilay
The only change to the source, was to indicate it has a new [working]
home, and provides for further development. Nothing in source was
changed to affect the functionality of the application itself. This
was what I attributed the necessity to bump the PORTVERSION.

Thanks for the reply!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-204494-13-HmhkqmXWF8>