Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 19:55:39 +0200 From: Benjamin Lutz <benlutz@datacomm.ch> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Linux apps, PREFIX and POLA Message-ID: <200605291955.42995.benlutz@datacomm.ch>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart4588008.jnRuXPsEh4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hello, I'm just about to finish the update for the linux-enemyterritory port. Then= I=20 started thinking about the PREFIX. Currently it uses X11BASE. An opinion th= at=20 I've noticed growing in popularity is that we should move away from X11BASE= =20 towards LOCALBASE. The porters handbook states that a port should use X11BA= SE=20 it if it uses X11 files or links against libs. Now while Enemy Territory obviously does require X11, it actually links=20 against the linux version of the X11 libs. I suppose it'd be possible to ru= n=20 it without a FreeBSD X11 installed, just with a Linux X11. So my question i= s:=20 Should I move linux-enemyterritory from X11BASE to LOCALBASE? Would such a= =20 move violate POLA, ie will anyone notice the change, and care about it? Cheers Benjamin --nextPart4588008.jnRuXPsEh4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEezWegShs4qbRdeQRAg5sAJ9SEqWsy5YpnjAGy5/PVo+MLDE3WQCgheOM 1fCai2tnug07Km+0Mvv0T3E= =EVeK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4588008.jnRuXPsEh4--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200605291955.42995.benlutz>