From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jan 8 16:43:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from modemcable126.102-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net (modemcable156.106-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.106.156]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20BCE15084 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2000 16:43:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from patrick@mindstep.com) Received: (qmail 57517 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2000 00:43:23 -0000 Received: from dhcp-mtl-200.local.mindstep.com (HELO patrak) (192.168.10.200) by jacuzzi.local.mindstep.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2000 00:43:23 -0000 Message-ID: <026b01bf5a3a$88ad8760$c80aa8c0@local.mindstep.com> From: "Patrick Bihan-Faou" To: "J.C. Frazier" , "Dirk Froemberg" Cc: "Vincent Poy" , "Scot W. Hetzel" , , , , References: <015d01bf57ef$34afcd00$8dfee0d1@westbend.net> <20000108150504.B76402@physik.TU-Berlin.DE> <387799F8.3182DD68@csocs.com> Subject: Re: ports/15873: New Apache_fp+php+mod_ssl-1.3.9+3.0.12+2.4.8 port. Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 19:43:23 -0500 Organization: MindStep Corporation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > So what do you think? > > > > I have talked to Dirk and agree with him that we need to organize and > consolidate > the apache* ports. I would be willing to work on it, with the permission from > the > other maintainers of course. I believe that 2 apache ports should be made as > follows: > - apache13-nonexport > -apache13-export > I could fairly easily integrate a configure script which would allow a user to > have the choice of what they wanted to use, including but not limited to, > mod_ssl, > mod_perl, mod_dav, mod_frontpage, php3, php4, imap, xml, dbase, GD, FreeType, > mcrypt, mhash, MySQL, mSQL, pdflib, OpenLDAP, zlib, PostgreSQL, and snmp. I > think > that these 2 ports would allow everyone to have what they want and/or need yet > standardizing the apache ports and making everything a lot simpler. None of the > current ports other then the one I submitted (PR ports/15873) have anything > close > to what I personally need. I believe that if we want to give the users the best > choice and let them decide, then we either need to work together and build these > 2 > ports or some of the maintainers need to step down and let Dirk, Scot, or I go > to > work. Another option is to let a couple of the maintainers work on one and a > couple others work on the other. Any feedback? This sounds like a great way to approach it. Just a question, is the distinction between "export" and "nonexport" only for encryption reasons. If it is, is it possible to use the "USA_RESIDENT" variable to select the correct setting and hence have only *ONE* apache port ? I know I am pushing it, but if there are existing mechanism, let's use them. Patrick. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message