From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jun 2 1:59: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from kalaid.f2f.com.ua (kalaid.f2f.com.ua [62.149.0.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDBF37B423 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 01:58:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@mail-in.net) Received: from mail.uic-in.net (root@[212.35.189.4]) by kalaid.f2f.com.ua (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5290BB13998; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 12:00:12 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@mail-in.net) Received: from notebook.vega.com (das0-l46.uic-in.net [212.35.189.173]) by mail.uic-in.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f528wRo50215; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 11:58:33 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@mail-in.net) Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 11:58:33 +0300 (EEST) Message-Id: <200106020858.f528wRo50215@mail.uic-in.net> To: mwm@mired.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG From: Maxim Sobolev Reply-To: sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WITHOUT_X vs. WITHOUT_X11 vs. NO_X X-Mailer: Pygmy (v0.5.8) In-Reply-To: <15128.35153.820695.616260@guru.mired.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 2 Jun 2001 01:36:01 -0500, Mike Meyer wrote: > Maxim Sobolev types: > > At the same time, we have X11BASE, so little consistency > > certainly won't hurt. > > A little consistency hurts when it causes a lot of inconsistency. Most > of the variables in /etc don't have version numbers. For ports, > WITHOUT_GTK, WITHOUT_GLIB, WITHOUT_IMLIB, and WITHOUT_GNOME don't have > version numbers, and those are the ones most similar to this in > functionality. > > WITHOUT_X is the one that was documented after it was discussed on > -dco. It's the one users will expect to work. -doc desn't have any authority over -ports issues. This question was discusses some time ago and consensus reached about WITHOUT_X11. Documentation should follow architecture desisions, not otherwise. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message