From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 6 13:32:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D30916A415 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B6113C455 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19EE51931 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 08:32:11 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:32:09 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070106133209.0cdda901@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <459F1719.9010407@optusnet.com.au> References: <00bb01c73134$b061fa60$0a32a8c0@rob> <459F0D1B.7090608@tandon.net> <459F1719.9010407@optusnet.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Mail being sent from my domain... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:32:13 -0000 On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 14:27:21 +1100 Colin House wrote: > Check out http://openspf.org - implementing SPF will help prevent > spoofed emails from being delivered and will start to cut down on the > "backscatter" This often claimed, but I don't really see how it's going to help much. Any benefit relies on an initial MTA/MSA refusing to relay for domains that don't set the correct SPF records, i.e. it replies on the security of MTA's that are owned, controlled or abused by spammers. On the other hand setting SPF records means that more spam using the domain will be rejected at the SMTP level. This actually leads to more backscatter.