From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 12 05:41:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id FAA27591 for current-outgoing; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 05:41:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.116.240]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id FAA27586 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 05:41:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.31.2]) by Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (RBI-Z-5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA10518 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 14:43:47 +0100 (MET) Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.3/8.6.9) id OAA12422 for freebsd-current@freefall.cdrom.com; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 14:42:12 +0100 (MET) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 14:42:12 +0100 (MET) From: Christoph Kukulies Message-Id: <199701121342.OAA12422@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> To: freebsd-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: a last word on last Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Just for the record: When I do the last command (on a yesterday's 3.0-current system) it looks fine - despite of the many unresolved addresses. But piping the last command to anything, be it 'more' or 'head' gives totally garbled output. Fields contain garbage and seem to be shifted by one postition. Can anyone confirm this? --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de