From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Nov 9 01:10:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA2EA23CE3 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 01:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0681925 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 01:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 28B7BA23CE2; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 01:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28595A23CE0 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 01:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com (mail-pa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE1071923; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 01:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: by pabfh17 with SMTP id fh17so180766532pab.0; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 17:10:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=62PNuRvt0Zhl9tVdzayDDtfRKZU+RS7j+ADTlrw61rU=; b=I6ozWdl2ildB6i6dy2oXkv1DCqzIMMZEGH8rgGbKNg0wjdzeWwHkKI1gdvIU00RihJ KfGN83VIizrWF+UIRPstuUSJH4qhG3EHG+r8SOBmOfmfiR59lDdIkR3DjwooYt5A/By0 uTo70fXAKtWqVP9hBLn2HE3xvzfImx3UQoTg4BTd9IBeUFvdSnhpKwzAsaJNJ7Iqyhfu IxtQGQg09o90aGnycu+UpaefYqvPuOkhgDSXE0Q5cvghywhY7pywNWWL5+z5NQri6xOk YqscBIZYfrMgMvdvfQETyKqSKGKlkoRzZprprPMgxxXsagHqDtxiTI6yt+xLIGGjuoc/ N7Jw== X-Received: by 10.66.181.234 with SMTP id dz10mr35905848pac.51.1447031430462; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 17:10:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:601:800:126d:6c97:bf3:2260:c8ab? ([2601:601:800:126d:6c97:bf3:2260:c8ab]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fl1sm12759487pab.10.2015.11.08.17.10.29 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 08 Nov 2015 17:10:29 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: mtree patch for WITHOUT_LPR From: NGie Cooper In-Reply-To: <83EBC2D5-D4A1-4D5E-8538-A536C8A8500C@rpi.edu> Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 17:10:28 -0800 Cc: Dmitry Morozovsky , gad@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <43EEAD5C-5AE9-4704-B3D8-60B19311A773@gmail.com> References: <83EBC2D5-D4A1-4D5E-8538-A536C8A8500C@rpi.edu> To: Garance A Drosehn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 01:10:31 -0000 > On Nov 8, 2015, at 17:04, Garance A Drosehn wrote: >=20 > On 7 Nov 2015, at 6:08, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: >>=20 >> as you're still maintaining lpr, I'm passing this through you. >>=20 >> If one build his server WITHOUT_LPR, there are constantly few = directories that >> are created by make hierarchy and then reported my make check-old. >>=20 >> Attached is a small patch against -current that should eliminate it = (inspired >> by BSD.groff.mtree). >>=20 >> Your thoughts? >=20 > Thanks for checking with me. >=20 > While I've done a lot with 'lpr', I have not done much of anything = with > mtree files. >=20 > After having read through the rest of this thread, I have the = impression > that we're no longer interested in a separate mtree subfile for 'lpr'. > Instead we'll go with Brian's observation that: "if a directory is in = the > dist mtrees, it should not be listed as an OLD_DIRS." >=20 > Am I correct in thinking that? With OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc, yes. With ObsoleteFiles.inc, the = directories should still be removed. Thanks! -NGie=