From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Nov 30 16:44:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F4C37B404 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:44:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA15196; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:44:21 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001130173952.0495e760@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:41:09 -0700 To: Jamie Bowden , Terry Lambert From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Here is what IBM thinks about using FreeBSD on their newer Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <200011291822.LAA19741@usr08.primenet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 07:10 AM 11/30/2000, Jamie Bowden wrote: >I used OS/2's boot manager for a very long time and still would if OS/2 >Warp would install on my current hardware, but having also bought >Partition Magic, I have found Boot Magic to be a very good replacement. Do the IBM Boot Manager and Boot Magic replace the BIOS hard disk code as OnTrack Disk Manager does? It seems to me that this is what might be needed to get things working if the original AT BIOS can't handle the drive. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message