Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 22:25:15 -0700 From: Arun Sharma <adsharma@sharmas.dhs.org> To: tlambert@primenet.com Cc: smp@freebsd.org Subject: source control (Was Re: SMP discussion moving to freebsd-smp) Message-ID: <200006220525.WAA29645@sharmas.dhs.org> In-Reply-To: <200006211654.JAA28545@usr08.primenet.com> References: <200006211654.JAA28545@usr08.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 16:54:28 +0000 (GMT), Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> wrote: > > Yes. I agree. I have no problems with it being bolluxed up for 1 day > > or 1 week or even if it will gain us a lot, 2 weeks. Beyond that, it > > becomes too painful for me to use the tree. I susepct others would > > agree with threasholds in this general area, some tigheter some > > looser. > > Too bad the source code control tool that FreeBSD uses doesn't > support multiple lines of developement. AFAIK, you can have multiple branches in cvs. You probably meant, it doesn't support multiple lines of developement _well_ ? Or am I overlooking some obvious shortcoming of cvs ? At work, we use perforce. The nice thing (which cvs doesn't have) about it is that it has a concept of a changeset. Any extended discussion is off topic here, I think. I don't mind offline email though :) -Arun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006220525.WAA29645>