From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Apr 10 18:49:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from implode.root.com (root.com [209.102.106.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD8D150B5 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 18:49:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA27717; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 18:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199904110145.SAA27717@implode.root.com> To: Matthew Dillon Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Annoying debug-kernel config messages In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 10 Apr 1999 14:15:30 PDT." <199904102115.OAA01764@apollo.backplane.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 18:45:54 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I am getting wholely sick of this blasted config message. If you are > going to print the message, print it once and be done with it. Not > every time I config! I'd get rid of the message entirely, in fact. > > Also, if you guys insist of making 'make' generate a debug kernel called > 'kernel.debug' by default, at LEAST objcopy it to 'kernel' to generate > the non-debug version during the main 'make' procedure rather then > during the 'make install' procedure. Not all of us use make install to > install new kernels. > > I've gone from having to cp/strip to having to objcopy. My life is not > made easier. > > I don't mind generating both a debug and non-debug kernel by default. But > it must be done in the correct fashion. I agree with Matt. Actually I really don't like the idea of building a debug kernel by default and would really prefer that we not do that. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message