From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 13:26:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C331065683; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 13:26:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@gritton.org) Received: from gritton.org (gritton.org [161.58.222.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398518FC28; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 13:26:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@gritton.org) Received: from glorfindel.gritton.org (c-76-27-80-223.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [76.27.80.223]) (authenticated bits=0) by gritton.org (8.13.6.20060614/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m82DQqDn049138; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 07:26:54 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <48BD3F1C.9050202@gritton.org> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:26:52 -0600 From: James Gritton User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer , FreeBSD virtualization mailing list References: <20080828185639.P66593@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20080902000516.GA48622@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <48BCED8E.5030109@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <48BCED8E.5030109@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.93, clamav-milter version 0.93 on gritton.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Subject: Re: Step 1.5 needs review X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:26:57 -0000 These are related to the virtual hostname stubs in vimage, all of which will be fixed when the jail_set framework is added. - Jamie Julian Elischer wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote: > >> - sys/netinet6/icmp6.c: >> - This (and IIRC a couple other files in ipsec) contain comments like >> "XXX this below is WRONG". It would be nice if the issue could be >> fixed or if that's not feasible, a more detailed comment should >> be added. > > hmm yeah