Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:35:55 +0200 From: "Niekie Myburgh (QData)" <niekie@rcf.co.za> To: 'Stijn Hoop' <stijn@win.tue.nl> Cc: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, "'freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: PAM (was: Re: MAIL set by whom?) Message-ID: <C7F233BFBFFBD211A4370000E220291A1BF309@ntnr2>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0845F.1A079D00 Content-Type: text/plain I posted a question about PAM & Passwd on 4.2. It seems that passwd "ignores" any passwd lines in pam.conf. I tried the pam.d thing (Run Linux compatibility, copy rc.d/* from Redhat 6.1 to BSD. When you try to log in, the login terminates, and syslog shows: /kernel: pid 22202 (login), uid 0: exited on siglan 10 (core dumped) Rename pam.d, and all is happy (which means I'm back to pam.conf). I have 300Mb swap (all unused) and 26Mb RAM inactive. I don't think that memory / out of swap space is the problem in this case. (I gather from what I could see on the net, that the main culprit for signal 10 seems to be swap space / memory) Can anyone give me an example line for the passwd entry in pam.conf (seems to be happier, although it seems to ignore my changes) I'm using the following: passwd password required pam_xxxxxxx options_options...... I tried pam_cracklib.so with it's options, as well as pam_passwdqc and it's options. I am being ignored. Regards. Niekie > -----Original Message----- > From: Stijn Hoop [SMTP:stijn@win.tue.nl] > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 12:07 PM > To: Dominic Mitchell > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: PAM (was: Re: MAIL set by whom?) > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:46:47AM +0000, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > Would it be a good idea to start using /etc/pam.d ala RedHat, instead of > > the monolithic /etc/pam.conf? > > > > As far as I can see the support is already there, it's just not being > > used due to the presence of the /etc/pam.conf. > > > > This would make installing PAM entries far easier for the ports. > > Seconded. I don't see any reason *not* to do it this way. > > OTOH, ports are not supposed to install in /etc, so the best way would > be to extend pam to support /usr/local/etc/pam.d *and* /etc/pam.d > (if it doesn't already do this). > > No, I'm not sending patches, sorry :) > > --Stijn > > -- > Nostalgia ain't what it used to be. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0845F.1A079D00 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3DUS-ASCII"> <META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version = 5.5.2652.35"> <TITLE>RE: PAM (was: Re: MAIL set by whom?)</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">I posted a question = about PAM & Passwd on 4.2. It seems that passwd = "ignores" any passwd lines in pam.conf. I tried the = pam.d thing (Run Linux compatibility, copy rc.d/* from Redhat 6.1 to = BSD. When you try to log in, the login terminates, and syslog = shows:</FONT></P> <P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">/kernel: pid 22202 = (login), uid 0: exited on siglan 10 (core dumped)</FONT> </P> <P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Rename pam.d, and = all is happy (which means I'm back to pam.conf).</FONT> </P> <P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">I have 300Mb swap = (all unused) and 26Mb RAM inactive. I don't think that memory / = out of swap space is the problem in this case. (I gather from what I = could see on the net, that the main culprit for signal 10 seems to be = swap space / memory)</FONT></P> <P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Can anyone give me = an example line for the passwd entry in pam.conf (seems to be happier, = although it seems to ignore my changes)</FONT></P> <P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">I'm using the = following:</FONT> </P> <P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">passwd = = password = required = pam_xxxxxxx = options_options......</FONT> </P> <P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">I tried = pam_cracklib.so with it's options, as well as pam_passwdqc and it's = options. I am being ignored.</FONT> </P> <P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Regards.</FONT> </P> <P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Niekie</FONT> </P> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <UL> <P><FONT SIZE=3D1 FACE=3D"Arial">-----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><B><FONT SIZE=3D1 FACE=3D"Arial">From: </FONT></B> <FONT = SIZE=3D1 FACE=3D"Arial">Stijn Hoop [SMTP:stijn@win.tue.nl]</FONT> <BR><B><FONT SIZE=3D1 FACE=3D"Arial">Sent: </FONT></B> <FONT = SIZE=3D1 FACE=3D"Arial">Monday, January 22, 2001 12:07 PM</FONT> <BR><B><FONT SIZE=3D1 = FACE=3D"Arial">To: </FONT></B> <FONT SIZE=3D1 = FACE=3D"Arial">Dominic Mitchell</FONT> <BR><B><FONT SIZE=3D1 = FACE=3D"Arial">Cc: </FONT></B> <FONT SIZE=3D1 = FACE=3D"Arial">freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; = freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org</FONT> <BR><B><FONT SIZE=3D1 = FACE=3D"Arial">Subject: </FONT>= </B> <FONT SIZE=3D1 FACE=3D"Arial">Re: PAM (was: Re: MAIL set by = whom?)</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:46:47AM = +0000, Dominic Mitchell wrote:</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">> Would it be a good idea to start = using /etc/pam.d ala RedHat, instead of</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">> the monolithic = /etc/pam.conf?</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">> As far as I can see the support = is already there, it's just not being</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">> used due to the presence of the = /etc/pam.conf.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">> This would make installing PAM = entries far easier for the ports.</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Seconded. I don't see any reason *not* = to do it this way.</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">OTOH, ports are not supposed to = install in /etc, so the best way would</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">be to extend pam to support = /usr/local/etc/pam.d *and* /etc/pam.d</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">(if it doesn't already do = this).</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">No, I'm not sending patches, sorry = :)</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">--Stijn</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">-- </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Nostalgia ain't what it used to = be.</FONT> </P> <BR> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">To Unsubscribe: send mail to = majordomo@FreeBSD.org</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">with "unsubscribe = freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message</FONT> </P> </UL> </BODY> </HTML> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0845F.1A079D00-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C7F233BFBFFBD211A4370000E220291A1BF309>