From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 7 09:57:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56A0E4F7; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svn.freebsd.org (svn.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:2068::e6a:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43014803; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svn.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.70]) by svn.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sA79vpOA033910; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:57:51 GMT (envelope-from marino@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from marino@localhost) by svn.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sA79vp3e033909; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:57:51 GMT (envelope-from marino@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201411070957.sA79vp3e033909@svn.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: svn.freebsd.org: marino set sender to marino@FreeBSD.org using -f From: John Marino Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:57:51 +0000 (UTC) To: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r372251 - head/www/paros X-SVN-Group: ports-head MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:57:51 -0000 Author: marino Date: Fri Nov 7 09:57:50 2014 New Revision: 372251 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/372251 QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r372251/ Log: www/paros: Assume it works with java > 1.6 This port was originally set for 1.5, but a later commit acknowledged that it worked on 1.6 as well, but didn't say it was limited to 1.6. Let's assume this unmaintained port can run on java higher than 1.6 and rely on user feedback to tell us if this isn't a good assumption. (I don't know how to run-time test it myself) Modified: head/www/paros/Makefile Modified: head/www/paros/Makefile ============================================================================== --- head/www/paros/Makefile Fri Nov 7 09:55:22 2014 (r372250) +++ head/www/paros/Makefile Fri Nov 7 09:57:50 2014 (r372251) @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ PORTNAME= paros PORTVERSION= 3.2.13 -PORTREVISION= 1 +PORTREVISION= 2 CATEGORIES= www security java MASTER_SITES= SF/${PORTNAME}/Paros/Version%20${PORTVERSION} DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}-unix @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ WRKSRC= ${WRKDIR}/${PORTNAME} USE_JAVA= yes JAVA_RUN= yes -JAVA_VERSION= 1.6 +JAVA_VERSION= 1.6+ NO_BUILD= yes USES= dos2unix zip