From owner-freebsd-current Mon Aug 20 10: 9:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57FF37B401 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:09:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA04189 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:09:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.3/8.9.1) id f7KH9CS32677; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:09:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15233.17464.670084.800903@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:09:12 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: sharing disk between current and stable? X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is it safe to share a disk between -current and -stable these days? I've been away from freebsd for the last few months and have a fuzzy recollection that something about the on-disk superblock structure changed in -current earlier this summer (related to dirprefs?) and fsck on -stable wouldn't be able to fsck a fs used by current. Is that still a problem? Thanks, Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message