From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 07:27:54 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A67416A46D; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:27:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5439A13C44B; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:26:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABE046FED; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:20:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:17:37 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Bruce M Simpson In-Reply-To: <473F1B7C.1080907@incunabulum.net> Message-ID: <20071121231457.Q60495@fledge.watson.org> References: <4732110D.3090808@interactive-net.de> <200711171227.21855.zec@icir.org> <473EE26E.6050905@incunabulum.net> <200711171428.13522.zec@icir.org> <473F1B7C.1080907@incunabulum.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: re@FreeBSD.org, Marko Zec , Reinhard Haller , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.0-BETA2 routed and multicast registration X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:27:54 -0000 On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > We can bring it back in the 7-current train to keep folk happy for now, > sure, but I strongly suggest we get rid of it in future, otherwise, we risk > not taking the step of progress -- EBIKESHED. Just to be clear on this one -- I think that temporary re-introduction for 7.x is the right route (pun intended). Right now we're at 7.0 BETA 3 and we don't have a working routing daemon. Would it be possible for one of you (Bruce, Marko, ...?) to put together a candidate patch to reintroduce the old interface? We can also update any appropriate man pages (if any) to indicate that the interface is deprecated and will be eliminated in a future release (8.0). Thanks, Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge