From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 21:21:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B933B16A420 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:21:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B22543D46 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:21:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 32426 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2006 21:21:11 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Jan 2006 21:21:10 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 28B5F28420; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:21:10 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Grzegorz Danecki References: <41b95770601261225m2a575b19o@mail.gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 26 Jan 2006 16:21:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <41b95770601261225m2a575b19o@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <44psmey9bu.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "screen" alternative X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:21:11 -0000 Grzegorz Danecki writes: > I'm running 5.4 Stable and I'm looking for something, that can let me detach > my session leaving my software running. First thought - "screen", but hey, > there is no screen package in ports collection :( Google says something that > it was removed due to high cpu utilization few releases ago. Is this true? # grep PACKAGE /usr/ports/sysutils/screen/* /usr/ports/sysutils/screen/Makefile:NO_PACKAGE= Tends to loop using 100% CPU when used from package - perhaps it hard-codes information about the build host # > Are there any alternatives? Because as I can remember screen was frequently > used and highly appreciated application. No alternatives, but screen is *still* a frequently used application. > Or should I rather look for some sources instead of package? Any problems > with that? # cd /usr/ports/sysutils/screen; make install clean