From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 31 11: 1:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from amc.isi.edu (amc.isi.edu [128.9.160.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A4037B491 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:01:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (yushunwa@localhost) by amc.isi.edu (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0VJ0w601374; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:00:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yushunwa@amc.isi.edu) Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:00:58 -0800 (PST) From: Yu-Shun Wang To: Cc: Subject: Re: IPComp question In-Reply-To: <24914.980910769@coconut.itojun.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > I tried to measure bandwidth with IPComp enabled, but kept > > getting the error message "no response" from netperf > > (/usr/ports/benchmark/netperf). > > > > For all I could tell from tcpdump, netperf established ctrl > > channel, and about 5 to 8 packets were sent with IPComp > > applied, but I never saw any return or ack packets for > > netperf. > > are there any strange number increase in netstat -sn on receiver side? No, but the problem is that there was no increase (actually, no record at all) under ipsec: IPComp. The number on the sending side seemed right. The increase matched the ones I saw from tcpdump. It looked like the IPComp packets either weren't logged or were dropped for some reason. yushun. > itojun > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message