From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 06:09:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167C116A401 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 06:09:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BF213C4B5 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 06:09:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l2867tmJ030858; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:07:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id l2867teu030857; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:07:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:07:55 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: Sean Bryant Message-ID: <20070308060755.GB84395@thought.org> References: <20070308014733.GA52736@thought.org> <45EF6E2A.6040706@cyberwang.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45EF6E2A.6040706@cyberwang.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing twenty years of service to the Unix community Cc: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: gcc43 build snafu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:09:21 -0000 On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:00:10PM -0500, Sean Bryant wrote: > Gary Kline wrote: > > Why, oh why, is this gcc-4.3 build bombing ("jc1: out of memory") > > when I've got .75G of RAM and a huge disk? If the gcc43 port is > > experimental, would somebodt kindly clue me in? > > [[ ... ]] > > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ > > It's right there on the front page. So yes I'd call it experimental. Right. I should've checked ggc.gnu.org. Be glad when they got their new compiler working. Looks soild for increased optimization, too. -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix