From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Nov 15 15:36: 5 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5A5A237B401; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:36:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-146.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.146])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D480943E75; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:36:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5])
	by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2031666D9C; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:36:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id AD5F9124C; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:38:49 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:38:49 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: RFC: Add a RUN_DEPENDS on gm4 for bison
Message-ID: <20021115233849.GA18035@rot13.obsecurity.org>
References: <1037376470.313.9.camel@gyros>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1037376470.313.9.camel@gyros>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:07:50AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> I'm seeing quite a few ports fail on bento because gm4 is not present
> for bison.  I'm wondering if instead of adding a BUILD_DEPENDS on gm4
> for all those ports, if I shouldn't just make gm4 a RUN_DEPENDS for
> bison. Thoughts?

Sounds like the right thing to do.

Kris

--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE91YWJWry0BWjoQKURAizXAJ4kkKQP99O/br0nDZC8xMc8JnTBZwCg9Ax3
JPzGugNOyY/KGRP9a72MVWc=
=FLmz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message