From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Nov 11 07:16:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA24865 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 07:16:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from nick.cendant.com (nick.cendant.com [198.245.183.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA24856 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 07:16:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rra@cms.cendant.com) Received: from mailhub.cuc.com (stratford.cuc.com [206.28.153.114]) by nick.cendant.com (8.8.5/8.9.2+) with ESMTP id KAA17340; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 10:15:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 10:15:57 -0500 (EST) From: Rick Aliwalas X-Sender: rra@jakobako.oakview.cuc.com To: Doug White cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: packet loss on laptop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 10 Nov 1998, Doug White wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 1998, Rick Aliwalas wrote: > > > I've tried both 3.0R and 2.2.7 PAO with the same results on a > > Compaq LTE 5400 with a 3Com 3C589D PCMCIA network card. > > > > Using zp0 or pccardd (ep0), I get 10-70% packet loss while doing pings. > > It also hangs the machine occasionally. I feel like I have a conflict > > somewhere but I'm not really sure how to proceed. > > Pinging what? 172.21.101.59. The laptop is 172.21.102.95. Our default router is 172.21.101.1. bash-2.02$ ifconfig -a tun0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 sl0: flags=c010 mtu 552 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 ep0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 172.21.102.95 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 172.21.103.255 ether 00:60:08:25:e6:f9 bash-2.02$ netstat -rn Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 172.21.101.1 UGSc 0 0 ep0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 172.21.100/22 link#4 UC 0 0 172.21.101.1 0:10:d:3a:4:0 UHLW 1 163 ep0 1148 172.21.101.59 0:c0:78:20:0:b UHLW 0 2901 ep0 906 bash-2.02$ ping 172.21.101.59 PING 172.21.101.59 (172.21.101.59): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 172.21.101.59: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=1.164 ms 64 bytes from 172.21.101.59: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.592 ms 64 bytes from 172.21.101.59: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=0.594 ms 64 bytes from 172.21.101.59: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=0.588 ms 64 bytes from 172.21.101.59: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=0.604 ms 64 bytes from 172.21.101.59: icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=0.649 ms 64 bytes from 172.21.101.59: icmp_seq=10 ttl=255 time=0.653 ms 64 bytes from 172.21.101.59: icmp_seq=11 ttl=255 time=0.631 ms 64 bytes from 172.21.101.59: icmp_seq=12 ttl=255 time=0.651 ms 64 bytes from 172.21.101.59: icmp_seq=13 ttl=255 time=34.507 ms 64 bytes from 172.21.101.59: icmp_seq=14 ttl=255 time=0.665 ms 64 bytes from 172.21.101.59: icmp_seq=15 ttl=255 time=0.655 ms 64 bytes from 172.21.101.59: icmp_seq=16 ttl=255 time=0.652 ms 64 bytes from 172.21.101.59: icmp_seq=17 ttl=255 time=0.653 ms --- 172.21.101.59 ping statistics --- 18 packets transmitted, 14 packets received, 22% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.588/3.090/34.507/8.715 ms > > Perhaps you have a bad/flakey cable? Sadly, the cable works flawlessly on Win95 (I'm dual-booting until this works). Thanks for responding. > > Doug White > Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve > http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | www.freebsd.org > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message