From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Dec 6 21: 9:37 2000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 6 21:09:36 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from kraeusen.nbrewer.com (unknown [208.42.68.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12E237B400 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 21:09:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by kraeusen.nbrewer.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BAC2A1742D; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 23:09:34 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 23:09:34 -0600 From: Christopher Farley To: James Lim Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netbsd 1.5 Message-ID: <20001206230934.A56204@northernbrewer.com> References: <001401c06001$83582680$5ac809c0@xyf> <20001206225310.A56114@northernbrewer.com> <018c01c0600a$86e3f640$fa5e78cb@gchang> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <018c01c0600a$86e3f640$fa5e78cb@gchang>; from jameslpin@pacific.net.sg on Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 12:59:48PM +0800 Sender: chris@nbrewer.com Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG James Lim (jameslpin@pacific.net.sg) wrote: > Hi all, > > I just read the release notes from www.bsdtoday.com on netbsd > 1.5. It seems to be the other way round as sendmail is replaced by postfix > :) Hooray! Ding dong, the witch is dead... In this case, it would seem that FreeBSD could indeed "learn something" from NetBSD. Can't we have a campaign to banish Sendmail to the ports collection? The FreeBSD handbook could shrink dramatically if Postfix were the default MTA. -- Christopher Farley Northern Brewer / 1150 Grand Avenue / St. Paul, MN 55105 www.northernbrewer.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message