From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 12 08:40:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAA916A401 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:40:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D3743D45 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:40:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3C8eDn9016692 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:40:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k3C8eDVW016691; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:40:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:40:13 GMT Message-Id: <200604120840.k3C8eDVW016691@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Daniel Gerzo Cc: Subject: Re: ports/95633: bruteforceblocker needs p5-File-Tail X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:40:14 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/95633; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Daniel Gerzo To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, joehorn@mi.chu.edu.tw Cc: edwin@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/95633: bruteforceblocker needs p5-File-Tail Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:35:23 +0200 Hello bug-followup, sorry for my late reply, but my backup-mx was a bit misconfigured, so I haven't received your email Edwin. This commit doesn't really seems right to me, since the current version of BruteForceBlocker in ports doesn't require File::Tail to run - that was only for first version 1.0, you can check the source. Also, I don't know why submitter had such a problem, I would say that he had somehow used an old version...if he needs any further help I will be glad to provide it through e-mail. -- Sincerely, Daniel Gerzo