From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 29 22:56:10 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3682416A420;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:56:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org)
Received: from www.cryptography.com (li-22.members.linode.com [64.5.53.22])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F84F43D7C;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:56:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org)
Received: from [10.0.0.33] (adsl-67-119-74-222.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net
	[67.119.74.222])
	by www.cryptography.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jATMuCZM001771
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:56:13 -0800
Message-ID: <438CDC7F.8030704@root.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:55:59 -0800
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
References: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E03907B15@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com>
	<200511291739.00985.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200511291739.00985.jhb@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>, "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Worked in RELENG_5, fails in RELENG_6
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:56:10 -0000

John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 November 2005 05:26 pm, Moore, Robert wrote:
> 
>>FACS does not replace FADT. FACS is an ACPI 1.0 table as well.
> 
> 
> Ok, nevermind then, I misread things in the brief browsing I did of 
> CHANGES.txt in the ACPICA distribution.  Do you have any ideas why an older 
> version of ACPICA would accept his FACS, but the more recent versions are now 
> choking on it?  Did the in-kernel version not verify checksums on FACS until 
> recently?  It seems that acpidump has always reported that the table is 
> corrupt, even with the older ACPICA distribution.

RELENG_5 and 6 are the same versions of ACPICA.  Only 7-current has the 
newest dist.

-- 
Nate