Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:55:59 -0800 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>, "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>, freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Worked in RELENG_5, fails in RELENG_6 Message-ID: <438CDC7F.8030704@root.org> In-Reply-To: <200511291739.00985.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E03907B15@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> <200511291739.00985.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday 29 November 2005 05:26 pm, Moore, Robert wrote: > >>FACS does not replace FADT. FACS is an ACPI 1.0 table as well. > > > Ok, nevermind then, I misread things in the brief browsing I did of > CHANGES.txt in the ACPICA distribution. Do you have any ideas why an older > version of ACPICA would accept his FACS, but the more recent versions are now > choking on it? Did the in-kernel version not verify checksums on FACS until > recently? It seems that acpidump has always reported that the table is > corrupt, even with the older ACPICA distribution. RELENG_5 and 6 are the same versions of ACPICA. Only 7-current has the newest dist. -- Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?438CDC7F.8030704>