Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:41:09 -0500
From:      "Steve Bertrand" <iaccounts@ibctech.ca>
To:        "'Dan O'Connor'" <dan@ferrarishields.com>
Cc:        'FreeBSD Questions' <questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: Release engineering confusion
Message-ID:  <20051117004128.98ED243D73@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <02db01c5eb0e$3ba86b90$0599460a@Dan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan O'Connor [mailto:dan@ferrarishields.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 7:31 PM
> To: Steve Bertrand
> Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions'
> Subject: Re: Release engineering confusion
> 
> > Thank you. However, that entire page out of the handbook 
> pretty much 
> > clarifies that a production environment should *not* track either 
> > STABLE or CURRENT.
> >
> > So I'm assuming I'm best off with RELENG_6_0 etc, etc? Does anyone 
> > here actually run STABLE or CURRENT in a production 
> environment? I've 
> > personally had the most luck with RELENG_4 which is still 
> my main box, 
> > but now my curiosity has got the best of me.
> 
> Yes, production servers should track -STABLE, since it's, 
> well, stable...
> 
> -CURRENT is the development branch, so for a production 
> server, don't use that. But RELENG_6_0 is the 6.0-RELEASE 
> tag, and you'll never get any updates (bug fixes, security 
> patches, etc).
> 

This is why I am confused, because as per the handbook (20.2.2.2):

"For these reasons, we do not recommend that you blindly track
FreeBSD-STABLE, and it is particularly important that you do not update
any production servers to FreeBSD-STABLE without first thoroughly
testing the code in your development environment."

Also in there, it states that one does NOT need to follow stable to get
the latest security/bug fixes, which makes me believe that on my
production network, I should track RELENG_6_X (security/bug fix), and in
my devel lab, RELENG_6 (STABLE).

Appreciating, but 'disagreeing' with your comment that _6_0 will NOT get
the sec/bug updates from my understanding so far. It is my understanding
that _6_0 will get ALL the bug/sec updates, but nothing else because it
is *frozen*, making it preferrably the track to follow in a pure,
24/7/365 environment, because new 'tricks' or 'features' are not
introduced here.

Does that seem accurate?

Steve

> ~Dan
> 
> 
> 
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051117004128.98ED243D73>