Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 19:31:44 +0900 From: Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> To: hsu@FreeBSD.ORG (Jeffrey Hsu) Cc: bright@mu.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG, Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Subject: Re: Locking down a socket, milestone 1 Message-ID: <200204281032.g3SAViPw081981@silver.carrots.uucp.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <20020425180432.C369237B400@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20020425175540.GN38320@elvis.mu.org> <20020425180432.C369237B400@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:04:32 -0700 (PDT), hsu@FreeBSD.ORG (Jeffrey Hsu) said: hsu> If you compare the two approaches, the BSD/OS approach is simpler hsu> because it is coarse. You're confusing finer grain locking with hsu> better. Well, maybe my patch just seems more fine-grained than BSD/OS because I have locked down only a part of the data in a socket. When all of the data in a socket is locked down, my work should look more coarser than now. -- Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <tanimura@FreeBSD.org> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200204281032.g3SAViPw081981>