From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 19:27:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B91ABB126E for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:27:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 606321711 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:27:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u76JR20e073510 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:27:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211627] security/certbot (the program itself not the port) requires py-parsedatetime<2.0 but 2.1 is in ports Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:27:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: stdin@niklaas.eu X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:27:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211627 Bug ID: 211627 Summary: security/certbot (the program itself not the port) requires py-parsedatetime<2.0 but 2.1 is in ports Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: stdin@niklaas.eu I just ran into the very same issue as described here https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/57094/ The thing is that `certbot` itself requires parsedatetime<2.0 while there is v2.1 in the ports tree. Thus, it gives the following error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/letsencrypt", line 5, in from pkg_resources import load_entry_point File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", = line 3141, in @_call_aside File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", = line 3127, in _call_aside f(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", = line 3154, in _initialize_master_working_set working_set =3D WorkingSet._build_master() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", = line 642, in _build_master return cls._build_from_requirements(__requires__) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", = line 655, in _build_from_requirements dists =3D ws.resolve(reqs, Environment()) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", = line 828, in resolve raise DistributionNotFound(req, requirers) pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'parsedatetime<2.0' distribution was not found and is required by letsencrypt $ pkg info | grep parsedatetime py27-parsedatetime-2.1 Python module for parsing 'human readable' date/time expressions Although the thread mentioned above is marked as solved, the workaround provided (to modify devel/py-parsedatetime's Makefile to v1.4 manually) is = not a real solution, I guess. If the dependency in the Makefile was false, I wo= uld have provided a patch but this looks like some change of the actual python = code is needed, which I think I can't cope with. :-) I had a quick look on wheth= er there is a bug report about this upstream, but as far as I can judge there = is none. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=