From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 14:33:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE7516A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:33:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA9D43D1F for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:33:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i61EWoLZ066313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:32:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.12.11/8.12.5/Submit) id i61EWo4I066312 for current@freebsd.org; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:32:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:32:50 +0200 From: Divacky Roman To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040701143250.GA66234@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <20040701135025.GA64383@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040701135025.GA64383@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Subject: Re: strange NAT behaviour X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:33:32 -0000 I have booted -O universe and it works... so there is definitely some optimalization error - is it worth it to catch the bug? I'd say YES! (isnt here even plan for officially supporting -O2?) thnx for attention roman On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:50:25PM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > > I have upgraded from CFLAGS=-O ARCH=p2 may 17th current (both kernel > and userland) to CFLAGS=-Os (I know its NOT supported) ARCH=athlon-xp > 30th June current and strange thing happend > > The machine in charge is working as a NAT and machines behind that are > not able to transfer any packet longer than 1472 bytes. its seems > fragmenting is broken but on that nat machine I am able to transfer > anything... > > I dont ask for help (since -Os is unsupported, but I am compiling -O > universe now so I might ask for help ;) ) just point it as interesting > behaviour... maybe some kind of bug? > and YES I have it all set properly > > roman > > P.S. I am not able to compile current kernel cause it says > "usbdevs_data.h cannot be made" or something like it.. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"