Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Jun 2003 08:14:02 +1200
From:      Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz>
To:        cp <cp@olympus.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Bind 9 Port
Message-ID:  <20030605201402.GA31117@grimoire.chen.org.nz>
In-Reply-To: <002401c32b14$2d539ae0$95260343@compaq7058>
References:  <002401c32b14$2d539ae0$95260343@compaq7058>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 08:40:14PM -0700, cp wrote:

[...]
> Before I go any further with 5.0, is it most appropriate
> to use FreeBSD 4.8 STABLE April with the Bind 9.2.2
> binary from ISC? I just want know it works or if there
> is a better combination that is secure and functional? 

If you're using the box for production purposes, it best to go with
4-STABLE. Bind9 has been working fine on my 4-STABLE machine for more
than a year now.
-- 
Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Power corrupts, Absolute Power is pretty neat



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030605201402.GA31117>