From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 5 13:14:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECCB37B401 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:14:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC2A43F93 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:14:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from grimoire.chen.org.nz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chen.org.nz (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h55KE2i9031169; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 08:14:02 +1200 (NZST) (envelope-from jonc@grimoire.chen.org.nz) Received: (from jonc@localhost) by grimoire.chen.org.nz (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h55KE2xn031168; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 08:14:02 +1200 (NZST) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 08:14:02 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: cp Message-ID: <20030605201402.GA31117@grimoire.chen.org.nz> References: <002401c32b14$2d539ae0$95260343@compaq7058> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002401c32b14$2d539ae0$95260343@compaq7058> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bind 9 Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 20:14:08 -0000 On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 08:40:14PM -0700, cp wrote: [...] > Before I go any further with 5.0, is it most appropriate > to use FreeBSD 4.8 STABLE April with the Bind 9.2.2 > binary from ISC? I just want know it works or if there > is a better combination that is secure and functional? If you're using the box for production purposes, it best to go with 4-STABLE. Bind9 has been working fine on my 4-STABLE machine for more than a year now. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Power corrupts, Absolute Power is pretty neat